However, council bosses have emphasised that whether or not the investments in Russian companies can be retrieved, the £5bn pension fund is in a particularly strong position
Almost 97,000 people who have contributed to the North York and York local government pension scheme could see up to £5m of the fund wiped out unless those managing it are able to recover investments they have made in Russia.
However, council bosses have emphasised that whether or not the investments in Russian companies can be retrieved when trading eventually resumes on Moscow’s stock exchange, the £5bn pension fund is in a particularly strong position.
The North Yorkshire and York Pension fund represents a tiny fraction of the £5bn in shares British investors have trapped in Moscow’s stock market, which has remained closed since sweeping sanctions were launched against Russia in response to its invasion of Ukraine.
Officers overseeing the pension scheme said while it had no direct investments in Russia, some of the external fund managers the fund used had discretion to invest where they could generate the greatest returns for the former and current local authority employees and numerous other public, education and voluntary sector staff in the scheme.
They confirmed while the pension scheme had no holdings in states such as North Korea or Iran, some 0.1 per cent of the investments were in Russia and due to China’s economic strength it was almost impossible to avoid having a significant amount of holdings on the Shanghai exchange if the pension fund was to grow.
The last decade has seen a turnaround in the fortunes of the North Yorkshire Pension Fund which has been described by council officers as ‘miraculous’, going from a funding level of just 35 per cent to 129 per cent, with a £1bn surplus.
Officers said even with the loss of the Russian holdings the funding level would remain well above 128 per cent.
Despite this, opposition councillors have questioned why those managing the pension fund did not withdraw the Russian investments as the prospect of war mounted over several weeks.
Leader of the opposition on the county council, Councillor Stuart Parsons, said it had been clear Russia was an unsuitable place to invest in since its invasion of Crimea in 2014.
Asked why the Russian investments had not been withdrawn before the invasion, Councillor John Weighell, who led the county council for 14 years and now chairs the Pension Fund Committee, said the Russian action had not been foreseeable as there had not been such a conflict in Europe for many decades.
A spokesman for the North Yorkshire Pension Fund said it was working with fund managers and its investment advisers to determine the most appropriate action in the longer term.
This article is for information purposes only.
Please remember that financial investments may rise or fall and past performance does not guarantee future performance in respect of income or capital growth; you may not get back the amount you invested.
There is no obligation to purchase anything but, if you decide to do so, you are strongly advised to consult a professional adviser before making any investment decisions.